What is "Viral Marketing"? (and language->semantic effects)
January 24th, 2009 by Tim WintleReading through the RubberRepublic blog, I thought I’d point the whole of team rubber at the article on the semantics of the word “viral” when applied to marketing.
This is a very interesting topic to me. With my leniency towards very specific definitions, I’m going to start right from the start, and explain that I’m certainly not a believer in Wittgenstein’s views on natural language.
To me, it’s not unreasonable to define a strict subset of natural language with a single, well defined, 1-1 semantic value function for discussing technical matters (and I believe the definition of “viral” should fit into such a subset), in the same way that we define mathematical terms in first order logic (I’m not going to get into provability here).
i.e. I think that it’s possible, and reasonable, to define the meaning of individual words which are indisputable and fixed when talking in technical language.
For this reason, it really drives me up the wall when two people talk about something, use the same word, but are actually discussing different things.
An example is how we have recently changed the naming for our “Syndicated Ad Units” (Previously “Content Units”).


